David,
On 1/10/12 4:55 PM, David Peterson wrote:
>
>
> The critical difference is that you almost never need to refactor the
> instrumentation in a Concordion specification. It's not a mini-language
> that's evolving in the way a Cucumber given/when/then language evolves.
> The instrumentation merely links the contents of the examples in the
> specification to the fixture. In effect, each specification has its own
> completely independent language that suits its needs exactly.
Are you saying that in the example on concordian.org,
<p>
When <span concordion:set="#firstName">Bob</span> logs in a greeting
<span concordion:assertEquals="greetingFor(#firstName)">Hello
Bob!</span>
should be displayed.
</p>
you would never rename the method "greetingFor" or change the arguments
it requires?
- George
--
----------------------------------------------------------
* George Dinwiddie * http://blog.gdinwiddie.com
Software Development http://www.idiacomputing.com
Consultant and Coach http://www.agilemaryland.org
----------------------------------------------------------
0 comments:
Post a Comment