Hi Adam
I had not seen Karthik's name previously, thank you for pointing it out.
Also, thanks for letting me know that my post sounded like I had an opinion about what Karthik had stated.
My intent was to get a clarification as to his thinking because his post seems to indicate 2 different opinions at the same time.
Thanks
Malcolm
M.Karthikeyan has provided his name, which is a perfectly normal way of
presenting himself, possibly just not in a western culture, and a
shortened version, "Karthik" in a previous post. You may not agree with
what he is saying but I think that we should respect that anyone from
any culture should be able to contribute here openly and present
themselves in a way that they are comfortable with given their
background.
Cheers,
Adam.> Hi M<http://www.pragmaticagility.com/blog>
>
> First off, what is the best name for you? M seem a little short and
> Karthikeyan seems like a last name
>
> Anyway ...
>
> I'm not sure what you mean when you say "is only a philosophy."
>
> If I were to use those words, it would mean that I was dismissing the
idea
> as "an interesting idea."
>
> It's clear that you do not mean this.
>
> Can you help me understand what you do mean?
>
> Thanks
>
> Malcolm
>
> --
>
> Malcolm Anderson
> Scrum Coach & Agile Engineer
> http://www.PragmaticAgility.com/blog
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:31 AM, karthikeyan M gotukarthik@... wrote:
>
> > **> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> > IMO: The whole team philosophy I personally feel is only a
philosophy..
> > there are issues like a Developer cannot be an effective QA and the
reverse
> > is true as well. Though each one can play the other person's role
but not
> > efficiently. So having a full time QA who can think in terms of a
Developer
> > , BA is more helpful. And yes I agree that the whole team is
responsible
> > for the quality of their deliverable.
> >
> >
> > -
> > Regards
> > M.Karthikeyan
> > Mob# 99008 44443
0 comments:
Post a Comment